Debt Yield Is Now the Binding Constraint on Sizing | Corlan Market Intelligence
corlan.
Platform Capital Markets Partners Market Intelligence Company Contact
Portals
Submit a Deal
MARKET INTELLIGENCE / MARKET READ

Debt yield is now the binding constraint on sizing

Across the files we sized this quarter, the binding constraint was debt yield more often than LTV. What that means for how you should underwrite an acquisition today.

THE CORLAN DESK · UPDATED AUGUST 2026 · 10 MIN READ
KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • Debt yield, not LTV, determined final proceeds on most acquisitions above $15M we sized this quarter.
  • Cap rates have repriced faster than replacement cost, so in-place NOI often can't clear a lender's debt yield floor even where leverage has room.
  • Debt yield floors run roughly 9-10% for bank and agency paper, 8-9% for debt funds, and 7-8% for stretch bridge structures.
  • Running the debt yield math before shopping a deal avoids a late-stage surprise on proceeds.

The old assumption

For years, LTV was the number that governed an acquisition. Sponsors and brokers priced deals against a max-LTV grid, and the rest of the underwriting followed from there. That assumption still shapes how a lot of files get shopped, but it's increasingly the wrong place to start.

What's actually governing now

Cap rates have repriced faster than replacement cost, and in-place NOI hasn't caught up. The result: on a growing share of the files we underwrote this quarter, in-place income couldn't clear a debt yield floor even where LTV still had room. Debt yield determined final proceeds on the majority of acquisitions above $15M we sized in the period, not the LTV headline the sponsor came in expecting.

TYPICAL DEBT YIELD FLOORS WE'RE SEEING
BANK / AGENCY
9-10%
DEBT FUND
8-9%
BRIDGE STRETCH
7-8%
Illustrative, drawn from live placement, not a rate sheet. Actual floors vary by sponsor, market and asset condition.

Two floors worth naming specifically: CMBS conduit paper on multi-family typically carries a 7.5% debt yield floor, and build-to-rent stabilized product is capped by an 8.0% floor. Whichever of LTV, DSCR, or debt yield is most restrictive on your file governs, full stop, regardless of what the other two would allow.

What to check before you go to market

Run the debt yield math first: in-place NOI divided by the proposed loan amount, tested against each source's floor. If debt yield is the binding constraint, the LTV number you were quoted on the phone isn't the number that shows up in the term sheet. Better to know that on day one than on day thirty.

"The LTV headline is a marketing number. Debt yield is the underwriting number. Solve for both before you name a price."

How this changes deal structuring

When debt yield governs, the lever that moves proceeds isn't a better rate, it's NOI. Sponsors who can document a credible path to higher in-place income (a lease-up, a rent bump already in place, expense recoveries not yet reflected) can often push proceeds further than one who just shops harder for leverage. That's a story a complete file tells; a summary sheet doesn't.

Where this shows up hardest

We're seeing the debt yield constraint bind most on stabilized multi-family and office acquisitions priced off pre-2023 comps, and least on industrial and newer-vintage multi-family where in-place income has kept pace with basis. If your asset falls in the first bucket, size against debt yield before you set expectations with your client or your equity.

MORE FROM THE DESK
Where the non-bank lenders are actually leaning inREAD → The maturity wall is a placement problem, not a pricing problemREAD → Why a complete file gets a better quoteREAD →
corlan.
Have a deal where debt yield is the question?
DEALROOM@CORLAN.IO · ONE SANSOME STREET, SAN FRANCISCO
© 2026 Corlan. Corlan is a fintech underwriting and placement platform for commercial real estate debt. We are not a lender or a government agency.
Submit a Deal